Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 13:43
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
PSA: You Probably Don't Need To Be Weighed At The Doctor's Office - HuffPost
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Browns' quarterback competition is right where it's supposed to be | The Huddle - Cleveland Browns
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Citi Pounds the Table on Nvidia Stock, Citing Big Opportunity in Europe - TipRanks
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What are the pros and cons of banning homosexuality?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is something brutally honest that needs to be said?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why should the law care about what I do behind closed doors?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How To Watch The 2025 U.S. National Championships - SwimSwam
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are some signs that a therapist may have poor boundaries with their clients?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.